- PII
- S3034496425110043-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034496425110043
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 11
- Pages
- 37-44
- Abstract
- The effectiveness of the use of Azolene biological preparation to reduce stress in plants of soft spring wheat of the Ekada 113 variety caused by drought and treatment with the herbicide Chistalan was evaluated. In a laboratory experiment, soil drought was artificially created, plants were sprayed with an aqueous emulsion of the herbicide (0.1% solution), an aqueous solution of the biological product, a mixture of equal quantities of solutions of the herbicide and the biological preparation. The field experiment was conducted in 2020–2021 in the Baymak district of the Republic of Bashkortostan, both years of the growing season were characterized by atmospheric and soil drought. In the field, the plants were treated once in the tillering phase with the herbicide Chistalan (0.7 l/ha) or the biological preparation Azolene (2.0 l/ha), or a tank mixture of the biological preparation and the herbicide. It was found that treatment with the biopreparation under stressful conditions led to activation of the antioxidant system of plants (a 1.4-fold decrease in the amount of malondialdehyde in leaves), reduced the suppression of root and shoot growth by 15.0–18.8% caused by the use of the herbicide. In the field, the application of the biological preparation (including in combination with the herbicide) caused an increase in the number of productive stems by 1.3–1.6 times and an increase in the number of grains in an ear by 1.3 times. In general, against the background of drought, the use of Azolen biological preparation increased wheat yields by 1.3 times, and the combined use of the herbicide treatment and biopreparation by 1.6 times. The obtained results gave reason to believe that the microbiological biological product can be used as an antidote that weakens the phytotoxic effect of herbicidal treatments, including in conditions of drought.
- Keywords
- мягкая яровая пшеница биопрепарат Азолен гербицид Чисталан 2,4-Д засуха защита растений от стресса
- Date of publication
- 22.03.2026
- Year of publication
- 2026
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 55
References
- 1. Полушкина Т.М. Органическое сельское хозяйство: тенденции и перспективы развития // Фундамент. исслед.-я. 2019. № 9. С. 59–63.
- 2. Gupta P.K. Reproductive and developmental toxicology. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press, 2017. P. 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804239-7.00037-8
- 3. Loboguerrevo A.M., Campbell B.M., Cooper P.J., Hansen J.W., Rosenstock T., Wollenberg E. Food and earth systems: Priorities for climate change adaptation and mitigation for agriculture and food systems // Sustainability. 2019. V. 11. № 5. P. 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051372
- 4. Camaille M., Fabre N., Clément C., Ali Barka E. Advances in wheat physiology in response to drought and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to trigger drought tolerance // Microorganisms. 2021. V. 9. № 4. P. 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040687
- 5. Кружов Ю.В., Лисина Т.О., Андронов Е.Е. Bacillus megaterium 501[rif] как антидот гербицида прометрина в посевах овса и кукурузы // Сел.-хоз. биол. 2020. Т. 55. № 3. С. 481–488. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2020.3.481rus
- 6. Motamedi M., Zahedi M., Karimmojeni H., Motamedi H., Mastinu A. Effect of rhizosphere bacteria on antioxidant enzymes and some biochemical characteristics of Medicago sativa L. subjected to herbicide stress // Acta Physiol. Plant. 2022. V. 44. № 8. Р. 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-022-03423-5
- 7. Тимергалин М.Д., Феоктистова А.В., Рамеев Т.В., Кудорова Г.Р., Четверков С.П. Роль ауксинпродуцирующих бактерий в преодолении стресса растениями пшеницы в условиях обработки гербицидом Чисталан // Агрохимия. 2020. № 11. С. 35–40. https://doi.org/10.31857/S000218812011013
- 8. Costa H., Gallego S.M., Tomaro M.L. Effect of UV-B radiation on antioxidant defense system in sunflower cotyledons // Plant Sci. 2002. V. 162. № 6. Р. 939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452 (02)00051-1
- 9. Ахтямова З.А., Архипова Т.Н., Мартиненко Е.В., Нужная Т.В., Иванов Р.С., Кузьмина Л.Ю. Влияние штамма Bacillus subtilis на содержание абсцизовой кислоты у дефицитного по этому гормону мутанта ячменя и растений его родительского сорта // Тавр. вестн. аграрн. науки. 2021. № 2(26). С. 28–40. https://doi.org/10.33952/2542-0720-2021-2-26-28-40
- 10. de Dios Alché J. A concise appraisal of lipid oxidation and lipoxidation in higher plants // Redox Biol. 2019. V. 23. Р. 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101136
- 11. dos Santos C.M., de Almeida Silva M. Physiological and biochemical responses of sugarcane to oxidative stress induced by water deficit and paraquat // Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015. V. 37. Р. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1935-3
- 12. Bernat P., Nykiel-Szymanska J., Gajewska E., Różalska S., Stolarek P., Dackowa J., Skaba M. Trichoderma harzianum diminished oxidative stress caused by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in wheat, with insights from lipidomics // J. Plant Physiol. 2018. V. 229. Р. 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.07.010
- 13. Glick B.R. Beneficial plant-bacterial interactions. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2020. 383 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44368-9
- 14. Qiao M., Hong C., Jiao Y., Hou S., Gao H. Impacts of drought on photosynthesis in major food crops and the related mechanisms of plant responses to drought // Plants. 2024. V. 13. № 13. Р. 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131808
- 15. Nikolaeva M.K., Maevskaya S.N., Voronin P.Y. Photosynthetic CO/HO gas exchange and dynamics of carbohydrates content in maize leaves under drought // Rus. J. Plant Physiol. 2017. V. 64. Р. 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443717030116
- 16. Pagnani G., Galleni A., Stagnari F., Pellegrini M., Del Gallo M., Pisante M. Open field inoculation with PGPR as a strategy to manage fertilization of ancient Triticum genotypes // Biol. Fert. Soils. 2020. V. 56. Р. 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01407-1
- 17. Corrivo C. Dal, Ferrari M., Visioli G., Lauro M., Fornasier F., Barion G., Panozzo A., Vamerali T. Effects of seed-applied biofertilizers on rhizosphere biodiversity and growth of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the field // Front. Plant Sci. 2020. V. 11. Р. 72. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00072
- 18. Гуцало А.Н., Маханькова Т.А., Поляков С.С. Действие противодвудольных гербицидов на критерии качества зерна яровой и озимой пшеницы // Аграрн. научн. журн. 2017. № 12. С. 52–54.
- 19. Фриден Ю.В. Влияние применения гербицидов в посевах твёрдой пшеницы на технологические свойства зерна в условиях Южной лесостепи Омской области // Вестн. Алтай. ГАУ. 2015. № 9(131). С. 5–8.
